Extended works of fiction about imaginary success.

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
lilacborrower
sergle

No fucking WAYYYYYY YOUTUBE CHANGED THEIR TOS TO AVOID PUNISHING SSSNIPERWOLF FOR DOXXING

sergle

A YOUTUBER doxxes ANOTHER YOUTUBER over criticizing their YOUTUBE content on YOUTUBE and because the doxxing was performed on Instagram, not ON youtube, it's "OUTSIDE THEIR JURISDICTION"
Is her getting minors to twerk for her or show their tits to her on omegle inside their jurisdiction? Or is that part of the TOS also going to be reworded

sergle

Oh and they are literally Poking Fun about the issue on their main account. slaaaay

image
bumblebeerror

I can’t express enough that sssniperwolf makes YouTube fucktons of money and without significant pushback from the YouTube community, YouTube will not fucking care about her committing a crime.

And I need to be clear:

Jacksfilms or Jack Douglass, is an old school YouTuber who’s been on the site for over a decade. You might know him from his “Your Grammar Sucks” series, or for his original songs, or for “Yesterday, I Asked You.” He is well established as a comedian. He has 5mil subs on YouTube, most of which he has gained steadily over his career on the platform.

Sssniperwolf does React content, and while most react channels will make an effort to credit original videos and creators or complication makers, or to add more helpful commentary [such as sneegsnag on twitch who has a criminology degree and reacts to police interviews to give extra context], Ssniperwolf does neither of these things. She has 34 million subscribers, and 5mil followers on Instagram.

Jacksfilms attracted Sssniperwolf’s ire because he, as a comedian, noticed this fact and decided to start a new channel, called Jjjacksfilms, where he reacts to her react content and tries to find the sources for the videos she reacts to in order to credit them. Jack has a harsh sense of humor, but this channel is not harassment by any stretch of the legal meaning. Jack is well known for being a pretty fair critic, and either way - the videos are public. What he did, while annoying for her, is not illegal.

Sssniperwolf, a 30y/o woman with a successful career, reacted by filming the front door of Jacksfilms personal residence, at night, and posting that footage to Instagram with the caption “let’s talk like adults”, whilst Jack, his wife, and their three dogs were inside. This act caused “jacksfilms home address” to be the second search result when you google his username. She eventually deleted the post after Jacksfilms rightfully informed his community that he had been doxxed, and asked YouTube to deplatform or ban her for committing a crime against him. She has since shown zero remorse for endangering the lives of Jack and his wife and dogs, and claims that it is defamation (it’s legally not) for Jack to claim she doxxed him (legally she did). She has also made jokes about it. YouTube has seemingly sided with her.

birdsareblooming

as FunkyFrogBait also said in their very good video on the matter, "without significant pushback from the YouTube community, YouTube will not fucking care about her committing a crime." is VERY important

They also go over this, but don't forget this. YouTube expects people to forget about it in a week, and people probably will, but YouTube has in the past done something if public outcry is massive.

it has to be massive.

Not only don't let Alia forget this, but don't let YouTube forget this. Don't let them forget they're making millions by platforming a criminal who, might I add, did in fact make children twerk for her on omegle and told them she's reward them by exposing herself. Only recently was this video taken down.

Rn twitter users probably have the most power when it comes to outcry, but if you happen to have one and feel like it, don't let them forget. If they forget the horrible system YouTube has built where people can get away with anything if they just make them enough money still stands.